Tuesday, January 27, 2009

What we get with Condom Education -
LESS AIDS
FEWER AIDS DEATHS
FEWER PREGNANT TEENAGERS
FEWER UNWANTED BABIES


The HF deleted this,
so I posted 
On MY stuff
you should say -

Your comment is currently undergoing DELETION
instead of -
Your comment is currently undergoing moderation

At least I KNOW Someone at HF Reads my post
even tho,
you don't want OTHERS TO KNOW THE TRUTH. 


LVKen7@Gmail.com

Monday, January 26, 2009

HF BS SPINS THE NEWS

1. The FINAL Stimulus package
hasn't been signed into law yet.

Discussion of it NOW
is a WASTE OF TIME
unless you want to SPREAD HATE AS THE HF DOES.

2, HF Spin =
" If you want to help stimulate the economy, then Nancy Pelosi believes you should not have any more children."

Wonder WHERE they got that?

3. Condom Education is something
the Cs have blocked for 8 years.
MILLIONS die from AIDS
and Unwanted Children are born,
but the Cs are AGAINST IT.

4. The HF has yet to discuss a
NATIONAL Sales Tax
NSTx
where ALL taxes are paid when the
purchase is made.

Why?
I GUESS BECAUSE IT MAKES SENSE.

5. "Nationalizing the Banks"
started MONTHS AGO.
Nothing new there.

LVKen7@Gmail.com

Thursday, January 22, 2009

HF - "According to a new report, even after Obama spends billion bringing high-speed Internet service to the entire nation, about one-third of Americans still couldn’t use it because of the expense."

HUH????
HOW can they "use" something they DON'T HAVE YET?

The HF is AGAINST TRUTH, AND FACTS
THAT IS WHY THEY READ
AND DELETE MY STUFF.

So YOU won't learn the TRUTH.



LVKen7@Gmail.com

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

HF Blocked this

The HF has started BLOCKING MY POST

What a cowardly thing to do.
======
Yesterday,
Obama's speech had this
DIRECTED AT THOSE THAT BRAG ABOUT BEING Cs.
====
What the cynics fail to understand
is that the
ground has shifted beneath them -
that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply.
The question we ask today is
not whether our
government is
too big or
too small, but
whether it works -
whether it helps
families find jobs
at a decent wage,
care they can afford, a
retirement that is dignified.
Where the answer is
yes,
we intend to move forward.
Where the answer is
no,
programs will end.

And those of us who manage the
public's dollars
will be held to account -
to spend wisely,
reform bad habits, and
do our business in the light of day -
because only then can we
restore the vital trust between a
people and
their government.
=====
WHAT IS YOUR TAKE?



LVKen7@Gmail.com

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

A Comment and Reply

1-7-08 =
A comment with MY replies on the HF email

TO Barb- mn writes:
FROM - LVKen7

*** Before I start,
please notice,
I include my Email address in what I write
HOPING READERS WILL CONTACT ME FOR DISCUSSION.
SINCE I HAVEN'T HEARD FROM YOU
I WILL REPLY HERE AND PUT IT ON THE HF HATE GDOC.

Ya know LVKen7, I can’t understand your problem?

*** I read the HF Email FIRST.
THEY provide the BEST info I get anplace,
but IT IS THEIR SPIN ON IT THAT BOTHERS ME.

Here is a president elect wording in various ways and subliminally, the dismissal of FREEDOM.

*** One of the things I don't understand about Cs is
THEY SELDOM USE EXAMPLES.

Thomas Soule writes - but I never understand what he means
because he give NO EXAMPLES.

GIVE US AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT YOU MEAN.

Conservatives stand for freedom. Freedom requires personal and individual responsibilities. As human beings it is our duty to carry out our responsibilities.

*** But, I see THAT as Cx
DON'T CARE FOR THE SICK,
WORKERS,
UNIONS,
TEACHERS,
SCHOOLD,
THE LESS....


Are you less of a human to not want to carry out your own existence on your own? You need your hand held by GOVERNMENT?

*** No.
The WORSE THING REAGAN EVER SAID WAS
THE GOV'T IS THE PROBLEM.

The Govt is NOT the problem.

Your so selfish you want to force the hand of government to hold all others hands?

*** No,
but The Cs - YOUR SIDE
is against choice
and letting people choose.

You talk out of both sides of your mouth,
Less govt = but WE HAVE A BIGGER GOVT NOW
THAN ANY TIME IN OUR HISTORY

Less Taxes = but we are deeper in debt than EVER.

And in your regard to ACORN, yea, why would acorn employees fraudulently register anyone they can?

*** THAT is what I would like to know.

If it makes no difference? It obviously does make a difference or the acorn employees wouldn’t be doing the opposite of what their job requires…causing needless wastes of time and money for everyone else.

*** OK,
but if someone is registered
and DOESN'T VOTE.
What difference does it make?

You think democrats are going to be truthful and expose the benefit of their ACORN employees lack of WORK ethics?

*** HUH?
"benefit of their ACORN employees lack of WORK ethics?"

I subscribe to ACORN Site
ALL they ever do is ASK FOR $$$$.
I just ignore them.
Try that.

LVKen7@Gmail.com

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Faulty Logic - HF Style

This is what the Heritage foundations says.

An administration truly committed to “change” ought to consider this option: bankruptcy.


It’s not the end of the industry, but a new beginning.


Here’s why:


  • First, it’s really not so radical, in terms of magnitude.

  • Yes, shareholders would stand to lose out, but with GM’s current market capitalization of just $2.5 billion, they wouldn’t lose much. Apple, by comparison, is worth $87 billion.

  • *** I guess we will start using the argument
  • that is comparing - Apples to GM
  • BS

  • Second, reorganization would put the automakers on a sustainable course. Key are labor costs:

  • Gold-plated salaries and benefits packages for union workers mean the automakers lose a bundle on most cars sold.

WHO gets the REAL Gold-plated salaries and benefits packages ?

Workers or Executives?
Answer = Exec...

  • There’s no incentive to renegotiate when government dollars to pay those contracts are a real possibility. With a bankruptcy judge’s approval, collective bargaining agreements can be reformed to fit economic realities.

  • Third, bankruptcy is the only way to restore innovation to the U.S. auto industry. In the end,
  • the automakers make money by producing vehicles that consumers want.
  • *** But Detroit wants to TELL
  • and advertise
  • what Detroit
  • WANT THEM TO BUY

  • But any government money is sure to come with strings attached.

  • Pelosi, for example, said the government would exact a “recoupment” for any investment of taxpayer funds — specifically, a say in what kinds of cars it produces.
  • *** THAT is BS

  • That’s a recipe for certain failure and future bailouts. Bankruptcy, in contrast, strips a company down to its valuable assets and then sets to putting those assets to work in the marketplace. Whether it works or not, it’s the best chance for success.
***HF starts off telling Detroit what to do,
and then they end it wirh -
MAY NOT WORK.

LVKen7@Gmail.com

Saturday, August 30, 2008

Some wonder - How can Anything, be Anything, if it can NOT be defined?
How can Conservative, be Conservative, if it can NOT be defined?

LVKen7@Gmail.com